Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
“Out of,timber so crooked as that from which man is made, nothing entirely *85straight can be carved.” So said Immanuel Kant about humanity; so elaims Plaintiff Resolute Forest Products about the lawfulness of compulsory marketing programs developed by private parties and overseen by the Ü.S. Department of Agriculture.
In 2010 and 2011, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), housed within the USDA, assisted members of the softwood-lumber industry in establishing a budding Softwood Lumber Checkoff Order. Checkoff orders are rooted in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lewis-Ramsey v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2016
- Air Transp. Ass'n of Am., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Southern California Edison Co. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.