Legal Opinion

Glenn v. W. C. Mitchell Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1922No. 6046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLAND, Circuit Judge.

All that we intended to decide by the opinion filed in this action was that the judgment should have followed the complaint, which showed a cause of action against Glenn, as surviving partner of the firm of Glenn & Hafey, and that such an action did not authorize a formal judgment against Glenn individually. The defendant in error has filed a petition for a rehearing, wherein it is contended that a surviving partner may be sued at law individually to recover a partnership debt, without reference to the partnership assets. We did not intend to decide differently, 'but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Schall v. CamorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
  5. Reed v. DunlapCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hafey v. W. C. Mitchell Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. Glenn v. W. C. Mitchell Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API