Legal Opinion

A. D. Howe Mach. Co. v. Dayton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 28, 1913No. 1,223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition by the A. D. Howe Machine Company for writ of mandamus against Hon. Alston G. Dayton, United States District Judge for thé Northern District of West Virginia, to compel alleged compliance with the original decree in a suit for infringement of patent after affirmance on appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia to comply with the terms of the decree originally entered in the case of Coffield Motor Washer Co., Complainant, v. A. D. Howe Machine Co., Defendant. That suit was originally instituted in said district for an infringement of reissued letters patent No. 12,719. The matter was submitted on pleadings and proof on the 26th day of July, 1911, and a decree was entered declaring said letters patent valid and infringed by defendant, granting an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Smith v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. H. B. Chalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. Ward Baking Co. v. Weber Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  3. Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API