Legal Opinion

People v. Callahan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 5, 1974No. 72-227PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rechenmacher

Following a jury trial defendant, represented by court appointed counsel, was found guilty of burglary and sentenced to probation for a period of three years.

Defendant complains on appeal that the failure of the trial court to respond to questions raised by the jury after it began deliberating was error, even though the questions were obviously irrelevant to the issues in the case; that they indicated confusion and an instruction should have been given to clear up their confusion. Both the State and the defendant were represented by their counsel when the jury submitted questions in writing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. CanadayIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. The People v. GeorgevIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People Ex Rel. Walker v. PateIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. The People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  5. The PEOPLE v. TobeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. DuniganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. People v. VealAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. People v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. People v. HarveyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. SimmsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API