Suksdorf v. Humphrey
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Belt, J., entered January 4, 1904, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing on the merits an action of ejectment, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —
Respondents have made a motion to strike the statement of facts, “for the reason that the same does not contain all of the material evidence adduced at the trial,” and in their argument mention a number of exhibits as not being attached to the statement. The exhibits are attached to the statement, and the court’s certificate seems to be in proper form. The exhibits became a part of the record when they were introduced and received as evidence in the case, and the date of their physical annex*3ation to the statement is not material so long as they are sufficiently endorsed and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bowers v. LedgerwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- McAuliff v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Proctor v. HuntingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Proctor v. HuntingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Brown v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Rodgers v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.