Kromko v. Arizona Board of Regents
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 The question on appeal is whether the trial court erred by dismissing the complaint filed by four students from the University of Arizona who challenged the role of the Arizona Legislature and the Arizona Board of Regents (“Board”)1 that led to the nearly forty percent tuition increase for the 2003-2004 academic year. Because we find that the trial court erred in dismissing the claims against the Board, we reverse that portion of the court’s order and remand the case.
*610FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 During March 2003, the Board approved a 39.1% tuition increase for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. GlasselArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Bonnie Rateree, Ken Vaughn, William Gardner, Leander Brown, Plaintiffs v. Damon Rockett, Frank Piekarski, Otis GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Roosevelt Elementary School District Number 66 v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Rios v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kromko v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Marcie Redgrave v. Doug DuceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Industrial Commission v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Kromko v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Rosenkrantz v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020