Printup v. Trammel
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint, from Floyd county. Tried before Judge Hammond, at August Term, 1857. This was an action by William T. Trammel against Daniel S. Printup, as trustee, for Mrs. Abbey Farrar, on two promissory notes, each for #150, which defendant, as trustee for Mrs. Abbey Farrar, promised to pay, &c. Signed “ Daniel S. Printup, trustee for Mrs. Abbey Farrar.”
Read the full summary
Complaint, from Floyd county. Tried before Judge Hammond, at August Term, 1857. This was an action by William T. Trammel against Daniel S. Printup, as trustee, for Mrs. Abbey Farrar, on two promissory notes, each for #150, which defendant, as trustee for Mrs. Abbey Farrar, promised to pay, &c. Signed “ Daniel S. Printup, trustee for Mrs. Abbey Farrar.” It was proven on the trial, among other things, that the consideration of the notes sued on, was a town lot in Rome, which plaintiff sold to Samuel Farrar as the agent of Mrs. Farrar, that the trade and bargain for the lot was made with Mr. and…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
McDonald, J.
delivering the opinion.
The plaintiff in error promised to par?, “ as trustee,” expressed in the body of the promissory notes ; to his name, subscribed to each note, he added, “ trustee for Mrs. Abbey Farrar.”
[1.] The consideration of the notes was property purchased for the cestui que trust. A note given by A. and B. " as executors,” is recoverable from A. and B. individually. 2d.Brod. & Bing. 460. We think the case of a trustee different fiom that of an executor, who has no right to deal with the property of his testator. IXis duty begins and ends with tho collection…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Wright v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Charles Nelson Co. v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hill v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Cozart v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.