Legal Opinion

Hodge, Admrx. v. Urfa-Sexton, Lp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 5, 2014No. S13G1626Published

1Opinion of the Court

295 Ga. 136

FINAL COPY S13G1626. HODGE et al. v. URFA-SEXTON, LP et al. HUNSTEIN, Justice. We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that a conflict of interest involving a nonlawyer can be remedied by implementing proper screening measures in order to avoid disqualification of the entire law firm. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that a nonlawyer’s conflict of interest can be remedied by implementing proper screening measures so as to avoid disqualification of an entire law firm. In this particular case, we find that the screening…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Crawford W. Long Memorial Hospital of Emory University v. YerbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  5. Bernocchi v. ForcucciSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API