Legal Opinion

Kunz v. Johnson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1953No. 9316-r, 9329-aPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This appeal and the cross-appeal involve two separate causes of action. In his first cause of action plaintiff claimed damages from defendant for an assault and battery. In his second cause of action plaintiff claimed damages from defendant for an alleged malicious prosecution. Both causes of action were submitted to the jury, and resulted in a verdict on the cause of action first mentioned for $1250 actual damages, and $1250 punitive damages, and on the second cause of action for $5,000 actual damages and $7,500 punitive damages. Thereafter a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Bogue v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Tunnel Mining and Leasing Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Moore v. Kluthe & Lane Ins. Agency, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Specialty Mills, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Manuel v. WilkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Baumgartner's Electric Construction Co. v. De VriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Michlitsch v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API