Kucera v. City of Wheeling
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentSprouse, Justice
I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority opinion affirming the circuit court’s approval of the pay schedule formulated by the Wheeling city manager. It is uncontroverted that the Wheeling firemen regularly work sixty-hour weeks. It is unanimously agreed that *868Code, 1931, 21-5C, as amended, requires payment at a rate of one and one-half times the regular hourly rate for hours in excess of forty-eight worked each week. This dispute concerns the formula for determining the regular hourly rate.
The City of Wheeling arrived at a regular hourly rate in a manner approved by the majority…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- 149 Madison Avenue Corp. v. AsseltaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brackman's, Inc. v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
- Seneca Coal & Coke Co. v. LoftonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.