Legal Opinion
In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 10, 2005No. Master File No. 1:00-1898. MDL 1358(SAS)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
County of Suffolk and Suffolk County Water Authority (collectively, “Suffolk”) bring this action to forestall the contamination of their groundwater with the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”). Defendant Gulf Oil Limited Partnership (“GOLP”) now moves for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
According to defendant, “GOLP is a regional distributor of gasoline that did not refine petroleum products, manufacture MTBE, or belong to the industry associations identified…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bower v. WeismanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Tagare v. NYNEX Network Systems Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Boothe v. TRW Credit DataDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Nichols v. Agway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (" Mtbe")District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.