Brown v. Wakeman
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from city court, general term. Action for rent by Gerald B. Brown and another against Abram Wakeman. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the general term of the city court affirming a judgment for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.
Appellants’ main contention is that the verdict was contrary to the evidence; but on this appeal we have no jurisdiction to review the decision of the court below upon questions of fact. Arnstein v. Haulenbeek, (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 11 N. Y. Supp. 701. And, as the case does not purport to contain all the evidence, we are bound to assume that sufficient proof was adduced to support the verdict. Arnstein v. Haulenbeeh, supra; Howland v. Howland, 20 Hun, 472; Sewing-Machine Co. v. Best, (Sup.) 4 N. Y. Supp. 510; Cheney v. Railroad Co., 16 Hun, 415, 419; Murphy v. Board, (Sup.) 6 N. Y. Supp. 99;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arnstein v. HaulenbeekNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
- Murphy v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Davis Sewing-Machine Co. v. BestNew York Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Owen v. SellNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Scott v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1893