Legal Opinion

Gold v. Exxon Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 26, 1998No. 14-96-01138-CVPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Appellant, Gerald R. Gold (“Gold”), brought suit against appellee, Exxon Corporation (“Exxon”), alleging age discrimination. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Exxon. In his sole point of error, Gold contends the trial court erred in granting Exxon’s Motion for Summary Judgment. We affirm.

I. Background

Exxon terminated Gold’s employment as a staff tax agent in May 1992 amidst a yearlong reduction in its workforce. Exxon’s reduction in force targeted two distinct groups: 1) employees who voluntarily chose…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. M.D. Anderson Hospital & Tumor Institute v. WillrichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ronald Reed v. Neopost USA, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. Russo v. Smith International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. Winters v. Chubb & Son, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Herbert v. City of Forest HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API