Succession of Ploton
Supreme Court of Louisiana
A PPEAL from the Nineteenth District Court, Parish of Terrebonne. ./A Goode, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Bermudez, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rejecting an opposed item of an account presented by executors.
The opposition comes from the heirs of the deceased who contend that the sum of $1708 53, for which one Calder was recognized as a *212creditor <uid, as such, placed on tlie tableau, is not due and that said (¡aider is rather iudebted to the succession.
It is claimed that the amount is due Oalder for services rendered by him to the deceased, as the agent of a. steamboat at the time owned by Mm.
The only testimony adduced to rebut the legal…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Ridings v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Succession of BrandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Succession of DasteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Succession of PalmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Farrar v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.