Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 2, 1931No. 29114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, O. J.

This suit was, at the beginning, an action for a partition of the estate of H. O. Johnson, deceased, brought by a daughter against the coheirs and the widow of H. O. Johnson. The widow is not the mother of the Johnson. heirs. In answer to the suit, one of the defendants, J. B. Johnson, a son of the deceased, set up a claim against the estate for $1,620 and a claim against the widow for $71. The other heirs denied that' the estate owed J. B. Johnson any part of the $1,620, and set up a counterclaim against him for $35. The widow also denied owing him anything. The suit for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Succession of BrandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  2. Succession of DasteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. Latour v. GuillorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Succession of PlotonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  5. Succession of OubreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Muse v. MuseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Succession v. BerthelotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Laborde v. DauzatLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Muse v. MuseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Story v. StoryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API