Legal Opinion

Brown v. Stoner

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01886Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH SARAH BROWN, et al., : CIVIL NO.: 1:23-CV-01886 : Plaintiffs, : : v. : (Magistrate Judge Schwab) : ADAMS COUNTY, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction. The plaintiffs are a married Mennonite couple: Elizabeth Sarah Brown (“Elizabeth”) and Daniel Lynn Brown (“Daniel”) (collectively, “the Browns”). The Browns claim to be the subjects of a conspiracy between defendants Courtney Stoner (“Stoner”), her employer: Adams County, through its subunit Office of Children and Youth Services (“Adams…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API