Legal Opinion

Marriage of Dick v. Dick

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1989No. C8-88-2189PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in awarding permanent maintenance at the conclusion of a short marriage. He also challenges the court’s valuation of his homestead and the division of marital property. We affirm the valuation of appellant’s homestead but reverse and remand on the other issues because the trial court’s findings are insufficient to permit meaningful review.

FACTS

The parties were married late in 1981 and separated in October 1987. Each had been married before. No children were born to the marriage, and there is no evidence the marriage relationship…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Marriage of Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Campion v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. In Re the Welfare of C.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard AanerudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API