Legal Opinion

Lumber Co. v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 27, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After stating the facts: The Machinery Act (Rev., 5232), being the same as the act of 1901, sec. 69, ch. 7, and all other acts on the subject subsequent thereto, provides that "In all cases where any personal property, chose in action, or any property, except land, liable to taxation, shall have been omitted, or shall be omitted, in any future year from the tax list by the owner or persons required by law to list the same, the board of commissioners shall enter the same on the duplicate of the next succeeding year and shall add to the taxes of the current year the simple taxes of such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Purnell v. Page.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Caldwell Land & Lumber Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Free & Accepted MasonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. North Carolina Railroad v. Commissioners of AlamanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Barbee v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Waldroup v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Bowie v. Town of West JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Skagit County v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API