Legal Opinion
Cox v. Klug
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided July 6, 1993No. 07-93-0049-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.
With seven points of error, Mary Cox and husband, James Cox, challenge the take-nothing summary judgment rendered in their medical malpractice action against Panpit Klug, M.D. Because the Coxes’ action against Dr. Klug is barred, we will overrule the points and affirm.
Naming Dr. Klug, Texas Tech Clinics a/k/a Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (Texas Tech Center), which is a governmental unit, and The Don and Sybil Harrington Cancer Center, Inc. (Harrington Cancer Center), as defendants, the Coxes initiated the action underlying this appeal on 24 May 1990.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Texas Highway Department v. JarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- State Board of Insurance v. Westland Film IndustriesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Davis v. Mathis, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Brown v. Prairie View a & M UniversityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Thomas v. OldhamTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- University of Houston v. Elthon, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Putthoff v. AncrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Brand v. Savage, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Forney 921 Lot Development Partners I, L.P. v. Paul Taylor Homes, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.