Legal Opinion

People v. Horton

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1907No. Crim. No. 67PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment and an order denying a new trial upon a conviction of grand larceny.

That the verdict was warranted is most apparent. The evidence in the record is convincing as establishing that defendant and his nephew took the horse in question from the ranch where it was being pastured, brought it to the city of Los Angeles, and sold it for $115; that the negotiations leading up to the sale were carried on by both uncle and nephew, they claiming to be partners, and when the same were concluded, the nephew went into an office and signed a bill of sale, using a fictitious…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. VelardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. People v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. EttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In re Estate of SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. People v. FaganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DisperatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  2. State v. MellorUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API