Legal Opinion

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Desert Palace, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2008No. 49A02-0707-CV-551PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its action against Desert Palace, Inc. (“Caesar’s”) and Opbiz, LLC (“Aladdin”) (together, the “Casinos”) for lack of personal jurisdiction and on grounds of forum non conveniens. Chase raises the following restated issues on appeal:

I. Whether the Casinos have sufficient minimum contacts to satisfy due process.

II. Whether Indiana is an inconvenient forum for Chase’s action against the Casinos.

We reverse. 1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This appeal arises from the gambling activities and debts incurred…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson v. Travis BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Wolf's Marine, Inc. v. Dev BrarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Judi Simek, and Scott Everett v. Christopher Nolan d/b/a Lakeside Farm, LLC, and William P. McCall, IIIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Davis v. SimonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. and, Johnson & Johnson v. Travis BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API