Legal Opinion

Sokol Blosser Winery v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided August 28, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLISLE B. ROBERTS, Judge.

Plaintiff appealed to the Oregon Tax Court from the Department of Revenue’s Order No. VL 78-520, dated January 16, 1979, which affirmed the action of the Yamhill County Assessor and denied special farm use assessment on a portion of plaintiffs property for the tax year 1977-1978.

The subject property is approximately two acres of rocky area, unfit for growing grapes, situated in the middle of a vineyard which is specially assessed as farmland. The total property consists of approximately 75 acres with a winery located on the subject property. The assessor removed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hibernian Benevolent Society v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Corbett Investment Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. O'Connell v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Reter v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Reter v. CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anadromous, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1989
  2. Belozer Farms, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1986
  3. Girardet v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1994
  4. Farms v. Washington County Assessor, Tc-Md 100443d (or.tax 10-13-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API