Legal Opinion

Anadromous, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided September 7, 1989No. TC 2831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from defendant’s Opinion and Order Nos. 88-1093, 88-1094 and 88-1095 denying plaintiff property tax exemption for the tax year 1988-89. The case has been submitted to the court on stipulated facts 1 and memo-randa of law.

The issue in this case is whether plaintiffs tangible personal property used in its operations qualifies for exemption as “farm machinery and equipment” under ORS 307.400.

Plaintiff, as its name suggests, engages in the business of cultivating, raising and harvesting salmon. 2 It also conducts activities involving the sale of embryonic…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Daly v. Horsefly Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bain v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. General Electric Credit Corp. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Department of Revenue v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King Estate Winery, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1997
  2. Farms v. Washington County Assessor, Tc-Md 100443d (or.tax 10-13-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API