Legal Opinion

In re the welfare of J.D.

Tulalip Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2013No. Nos. TUL-CV-AP-2012-0446, TUL-CV-YI-2011-0041Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER AFFIRMING APPEAL FOR LIMITED REMAND

2Per curiam

This matter comes before the Court of Appeals (Court) pursuant to Oral Argument Hearing on December 6, 2012. Appellant alleges that the Juvenile Court erred by ordering placement of a minor child with her grandmother that was based on evidence not seen by the parties and against the recommendations of beda?ehelh. This Court reviewed the record and affirms the appeal. The Court orders a limited remand.

BACKGROUND

The facts below are not at issue. J.D. is a minor who has a troublesome family history, a record of inappropriate and dangerous…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Braam v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Braam Ex Rel. Braam v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bradley v. Tulalip TribesTulalip Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API