Legal Opinion

Bull v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1922No. 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoxce, J.

I. A finding on the conflicting evidence that the original contract for purchase of chats provided for shipment at the rate of one car per week would be sustained by the evidence. Under such contract Morrison & Coleman would not have been bound to accept the six cars shipped on July 9th and 10th and the two cars shipped on July 16th and 17th. 35 Cye. 179; Mechera on Sales, §§ 1138 and 1139.

Morrison & Coleman, having refused to accept the shipment, might show these facts in defense of the action to recover the price of the chats with no other pleading than a general denial. Altgelt v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bacon v. CobbIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Altgelt v. EmilienburgTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Winn v. GilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Goodwin v. BiddyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. San Antonio MacHine & Supply Co. v. Central Texas Power & Transmission Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API