Lyons v. Clancy
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Paul Lyons, et al., No. CV-20-00866-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 William Clancy, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs Paul and Marilyn Lyons move for default judgment against Defendants 16 William and Judith Clancy, Jere Clancy, Ole Gray Mare, LLC (“Ole Gray Mare”), and 17 Clancy Company PLLC fka Clancy and Co. PLLC (“Clancy Company”) (collectively, 18 “Defendants”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). (Doc. 15.) Defendants have not 19 appeared or filed any responses. For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.