Sherwood v. Tennessee Valley Authority
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on defendant Tennessee Valley Authority’s (“TVA”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Count II (the NEPA Count) of the Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 129]. Plaintiffs filed a response [Doc. 139], and defendant replied [Doc. 147]. After careful consideration of the parties’ arguments, the record in this case, and the relevant law, the Court finds the motion well taken and will dismiss the NEPA claim.
1. Background
Plaintiffs commenced this action on or about April 3, 2012, as a result of TVA’s allegedly new…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sherwood v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Sherwood v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016