Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Whirlpool Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2024No. 2023-0809PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 174.] CALDWELL, APPELLANT, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, APPELLEE; OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, APPELLANT. [Cite as Caldwell v. Whirlpool Corp.,

2024-Ohio-1625.] Workers’ compensation—When a workers’ compensation claimant perfects an appeal under R.C. 4123.512, subsequent expiration of R.C. 4123.52’s five- year continuing-jurisdiction limit does not cause a claim pending in a court to expire as a matter of law—Judgment reversed and cause remanded to the trial court. (No. 2023-0809—Submitted February 7,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. Summerville v. City of Forest ParkOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Jones v. Action Coupling & Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lewis v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Colt's Neck Homeowners Assn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026
  4. In re Estate of StraubOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. State ex rel. Holderman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API