Legal Opinion

Scrougham v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1990No. 49A04-9007-CR-355PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Defendant-Appellant, Leo L. Serougham, appeals from his convictions for Rape (class B felony), Sexual Battery (class D felony), and Confinement (class D felony). We affirm.

Issues

Defendant presents one (1) issue for our review, which we restate as follows:

Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions for Rape, Sexual Battery, and Confinement.

In addition, State raises the question of "whether this case must be remanded for resentencing on the ground that Sexual Battery is a lesser-included offense of Rape."

Facts and Procedural History

At approximately…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Tawney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Whittle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Watkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Kemp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Austin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API