Legal Opinion

Austin v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1992No. 49A04-9201-CR-1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Defendant-Appellant, - Jimmie - Austin (Defendant), appeals from his convictions for attempted robbery, robbery, and confinement. We affirm.

Issues

Defendant presents two (2) issues for our review, which we restate as follows:

I. Whether the identification procedures were tainted or unduly suggestive, and thereby inadmissible at trial.

II. Whether Defendant's convictions for two (2) counts of attempted robbery, five (5) counts of robbery, and seven (7) counts of confinement were supported by sufficient evidence.

III. Whether the convictions for attempted robbery and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wethington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kiner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Carrington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Austin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Jimmie L. Austin v. Charles MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Lukuman Aderbigbe v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API