James William Wheeler v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appeal from an order denying, without a hearing, petitioner’s motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Petitioner in substance makes four contentions. Of them, three are frivolous.
1. That petitioner pleaded guilty to the criminal charges [robbery of a national bank, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)] in reliance upon the opinions of the “arresting F.B.I. agent, attorney, probation officer and several United States marshals that he would not receive a sentence of more than five years,” even if true, would not warrant setting aside his conviction and plea. United States v. Edmo, 456 F.2d 240 (9th Cir.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Ronald EdmoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Benjamin E. SamaniegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Edward Eugene Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Samuel Portillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Edward Eugene Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.