Legal Opinion

James William Wheeler v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1972No. 72-1771PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal from an order denying, without a hearing, petitioner’s motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Petitioner in substance makes four contentions. Of them, three are frivolous.

1. That petitioner pleaded guilty to the criminal charges [robbery of a national bank, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)] in reliance upon the opinions of the “arresting F.B.I. agent, attorney, probation officer and several United States marshals that he would not receive a sentence of more than five years,” even if true, would not warrant setting aside his conviction and plea. United States v. Edmo, 456 F.2d 240 (9th Cir.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Ronald EdmoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Benjamin E. SamaniegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Edward Eugene Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. Samuel Portillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Edward Eugene Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API