Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Walker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1924No. 3888PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The special exceptions in the motion for new trial are to two excerpts from the charge of the court, and on alleged errors in failing to charge the jury certain principles therein stated. ■ The court charged the jury: “In this connection and as setting forth a rule or principle of law proper for your consideration in this case, I charge you the following: where an agreement establishing a dividing line between adjoining properties is followed by acquiescence and possession, the parties are concluded by their agreement; and when the acquiescence and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osteen v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Farr v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Bunger v. GrimmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Gornto v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Zachery v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bradley v. SheltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Brown v. HesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Greenway v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  4. Yarbrough v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Wright v. AnthonySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API