Legal Opinion

Yarbrough v. Stuckey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1929No. 19023PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Acquiescence for seven years, by acts or declarations of ad-joining landowners, shall establish a dividing line. Civil Code (1910), § 3821. A line may be so established irrespective of whether its true location was theretofore actually unascertained or disputed. “Acquiescence for the period required by the statute would be conclusive evidence of a previous agreement, though there may in fact have been *266none.” Farr v. Woolfolk, 118 Ga. 277 (45 S. E. 230) ; Christian v. Weaver, 79 Ga. 406 (2) (7 S. E. 261) ; Henderson v. Walker, 157 Ga. 856 (2) (122 S. E. 613) ; Thompson v. Simmons, 143 Ga.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osteen v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Farr v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Gornto v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Sapp v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. O'Neal v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bradley v. SheltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DumasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Warwick v. Ocean Pond Fishing ClubSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Smith v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Ætna Insurance v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API