Legal Opinion
Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1998No. 96-3034PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) promulgated a rule limiting annual compensation of certain Division I entry-level coaches to $16,-000. Basketball coaches affected by the rule filed a class action challenging the restriction under Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The district court granted summary judgment on the issue of liability to the coaches and issued a permanent injunction restraining the NCAA from promulgating this or any other rules embodying similar compensation restrictions. The NCAA now appeals, and we affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Agnew v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- California Dental Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Christy Sports, LLC v. Deer Valley Resort Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Byrum v. LandrethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- LAMAR ADVERTISING OF PENN, LLC, — CROSS-APPELLEE v. TOWN OF ORCHARD PARK, NEW YORK, —Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.