Legal Opinion

ALFREDO A. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1994No. S024618PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1215Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

In Gerstein v. Pugh (1975) 420 U.S. 103 [43 L.Ed.2d 54, 95 S.Ct. 854] (hereafter Gerstein), the United States Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment requires a prompt judicial determination of “probable cause to believe the suspect has committed a crime” as a prerequisite to an extended pretrial detention following a warrantless arrest, (id., at pp. 114, 120 [43 L.Ed.2d at pp. 65, 69].) The court stopped short of mandating a specific timetable for making a “prompt” determination of probable cause.

In County of Riverside v. McLaughlin (1991) 500 U.S. 44 [114 L.Ed.2d 49,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. SeguraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Conservatorship of WendlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Thompson v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Foxgate Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bramalea California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API