Legal Opinion

Horkan v. Great American Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1955No. 18939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

1. In this case, the issues raised by the pleadings and the evidence are numerous and complicated. As shown by his findings of fact and of law, the auditor has fully considered and passed on each of them, and the final decree should not be reversed because the trial judge refused to recommit the case for further consideration and findings by the auditor on the grounds set up in the plaintiffs’ motion therefor. "From the very nature of the investigation, a court of review must generally rely upon the trial court for such close scrutiny and conscientious consideration of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Curtis v. College Park Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Friedlander Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Massee-Felton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. McCarthy v. Nixon Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Howard Supply Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaheen v. KikerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Turner Construction Co. v. Electrical Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Greenbriar Shopping CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
  4. Gaster Lumber Co. v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Marsh v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API