Legal Opinion

Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Friedlander Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1923No. 14069, 14070PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “ When a payment is made upon any debt, it shall be applied first to the discharge of any interest due at the time, and the balance, if any, to the reduction of the principal.” Civil Code (1910), § 3433. But this section does not prohibit a creditor from applying a payment upon the principal, if the debtor so expressly directs. The instant petition, seeking the recovery of an alleged balance of interest due on account after full payment by the debtors of the principal, was not rendered bad as against the general demurrer merely because the bill of particulars showed that the plaintiff had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hargroves v. CookeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  2. Nisbet v. LawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  3. Ryan v. Progressive Retailer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Central Bank & Trust Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Roberts v. PriorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Colt Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Firemen's Insurance v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Shaheen v. KikerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. FoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Logan Paving Co. v. Liles Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API