Legal Opinion
United States v. Boyd
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 30, 1999No. 99-40001-01-SACPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, Senior District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the defendant’s following pretrial motions: Motion to Dismiss Indictment Due to Officially Inadequate Commerce Clause Nexus, Ex Post Facto Clause Violation, Second Amendment Violation, and Equal Protection Violation (Dk.23); and Motion to Dismiss or to Elect Because of Duplicitous Charging (Dk.25). The government has filed a consolidated response opposing both motions. (Dk.27). The defendant filed a notice of supplementary authority (Dk.30) on March 25, 1999, calling the court’s attention to the recent decision…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Winston Eugene Mitchell, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- United States v. SpruillDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1999
- United States v. ThomsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2001
- United States v. PfeiferDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.