Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomson
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 21, 2001No. 2:00CR191KPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBALL, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant Kevin Glade Thomson’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment on Ex Post Facto Grounds, Motion to Dismiss Indictment as the Statute Under Which the Defendant Is Charged Is Unconstitutionally Vague, Motion to Dismiss Indictment Upon Statutory Construction, and Motion to Dismiss Indictment Based On Provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 921 (a)(33)(B)(i)(I). A hearing on the matter was held on February 14, 2001. At the hearing, Plaintiff United States of America was represented by Barbara Bearnson and Defendant was represented by Larry R.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. William Maurice SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Cecil L. BursonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Barnes, JohnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Willard HartsockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BethurumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SmithUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- King v. Wyoming Division of Criminal InvestigationWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.