Legal Opinion

Haas v. Rothenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1958Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from so much of an order as granted respondents’ motion to vacate a notice to examine before trial the respondents and three persons described in the notice as employees of one of the respondents. Order modified by striking from the first ordering paragraph the words “in all respects ” and by substituting in lieu thereof the words “ insofar as it requires Kathleen McMullen and Arlene Suib to be examined, and the motion to vacate the notice is otherwise denied”. As so modified,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Schweinburg v. AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. W. L. Sutphin Realty Co. v. BreinigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API