Legal Opinion

Boackle v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 29, 1961No. 6 Div. 610PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

The .question in this case is whether a child unborn when his father’s will was made is entitled to take a child’s part of the father’s estate the same as if the father had died intestate, under the provisions of Code 1940, Tit. 61, § 10. (This section was amended by Act No. 112, approved April 14, 1956, Acts Sp.Sess. 1956, Vol. I, p. 439, by making the section also applicable to a child adopted after the making of a will. The amendment has no bearing on this case.)

Section 10, prior to the amendment, provided as follows:

“Whenever a testator has a child, born after the making…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Shackelford v. WashburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Toomer v. Van Antwerp Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Woodliff v. DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Ensley v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beverly W. Risher, as of the Last Will and Testament of Benjamin B. Risher, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API