Boackle v. Bloom
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
The .question in this case is whether a child unborn when his father’s will was made is entitled to take a child’s part of the father’s estate the same as if the father had died intestate, under the provisions of Code 1940, Tit. 61, § 10. (This section was amended by Act No. 112, approved April 14, 1956, Acts Sp.Sess. 1956, Vol. I, p. 439, by making the section also applicable to a child adopted after the making of a will. The amendment has no bearing on this case.)
Section 10, prior to the amendment, provided as follows:
“Whenever a testator has a child, born after the making…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Shackelford v. WashburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Toomer v. Van Antwerp Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Woodliff v. DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Ensley v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beverly W. Risher, as of the Last Will and Testament of Benjamin B. Risher, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006