Legal Opinion

Toomer v. Van Antwerp Realty Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1939No. 1 Div. 49PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, Justice

(after stating the facts).

The appellants insist -that the birth of children to Anna Virginia Spotswood, subsequent to the execution of the will, operated by force of the statute of that time, Code 1876, § 2284; Code 1886, § 1955, now Code 1923, § 10585, a total revocation of the will of said Anna Virginia Spots-wood, and that her said property passed by the process of devolution under the statutes of descent and distribution, the husband taking a life estate under the statute, Code 1886, § 2353, which gave him one-half of the personalty “and * * * the use of the realty during his life,” and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Kidd v. BorumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Robinson v. PierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Veitch v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Woodstock Iron Co. v. FullenwiderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Woods v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Hamilton v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Ward v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Barnett v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Williams v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API