Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1924No. 6 Div. 427PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

Under the procedure in this state, a person accused of crime is required, upon trial, to answer only the specific charge contained in the accusation, whether by complaint or indictment, and none other.

Upon the trial of a defendant charged by indictment with murder, it is error of a highly prejudicial nature to permit the state to offer evidence of the general bad character of the defendant as being dangerous, violent, turbulent, and bloodthirsty, where no such issue has been injected into the trial by the defendant and no attempt made by the defendant to sustain her character in any manner.

In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Forman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Dolan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Cassemus v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shikles v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Ledbetter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Bedsole v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Territory v. CorumHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Stearns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API