Legal Opinion
Ahmed Al-Torki, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Dr. Charles E. Kaempen, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee v. Inger M. Kaempen Kaempen & Associates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1996No. 94-55538PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
78 F.3d 1381
33 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1152, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1466,
96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2516
Ahmed AL-TORKI, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Dr. Charles E. KAEMPEN, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee,
v.
Inger M. KAEMPEN; Kaempen & Associates, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-55538.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 11, 1995.
Decided March 5, 1996.
R. Stephen Duke, Law Offices of Rodney T. Lewin, Beverly Hills, California, for plaintiff-counter-defendant, appellant.
Charles E. Kaempen, Orange, California, in pro per, for defendants-counter-claimants,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hiram Ash v. Eugene CvetkovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Meadows v. Dominican RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anthony Coss v. Tiffany & Bosco, PaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020