Barneveld State Bank v. Petersen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
For want of a nail, a kingdom was lost, an almanac informed us two hundred years ago. In this case for want of the nail being affixed to the proper horseshoe, the right of appeal has been lost. The horse (right to appellate review) early became unshod in the following sequence of events:
On August 2, 1973, the trial court signed and filed its “Decision — Order Denying Motion.” As its title suggests, this decision and order was not just an opinion. It was also an order disposing of the issues raised by the petition for intervention and the answers thereto. The test as to whether a document is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State ex rel. Zilisch v. AuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Ver Hagen v. GibbonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Baumgarten v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Town of Erin Prairie v. WellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fredrick v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. AveryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. AscencioCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Harris v. ReivitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Naus v. Jt. SD No. 1 Sheboygan FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.