United States v. Claudy Ray Herron and Johannes Faul
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Johannes Faul and Claudy Ray Herron, defendants-appellants, challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support their wire fraud convictions for fabricating and participating in a scheme designed to facilitate a large cash deposit in an American bank without triggering a Currency Transaction Report (CTR). We also consider an issue raised sua sponte: whether the facts alleged in the indictment constitute a cogni*1037zable violation of the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We find that the indictment did set forth a cognizable wire fraud offense and the convictions entered…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Stanley P. GimbelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Ira Henderson MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Claudy Ray Herron and Johannes FaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Kenneth Martin JumperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. RikyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.