Legal Opinion

United States v. Claudy Ray Herron and Johannes Faul

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1987No. 86-1413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Johannes Faul and Claudy Ray Herron, defendants-appellants, challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support their wire fraud convictions for fabricating and participating in a scheme designed to facilitate a large cash deposit in an American bank without triggering a Currency Transaction Report (CTR). We also consider an issue raised sua sponte: whether the facts alleged in the indictment constitute a cogni*1037zable violation of the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We find that the indictment did set forth a cognizable wire fraud offense and the convictions entered…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanley P. GimbelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Ira Henderson MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Claudy Ray Herron and Johannes FaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Kenneth Martin JumperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. RikyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API