Legal Opinion
Seibert v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1989No. 87-1376PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the cause is ordered submitted without oral argument.
The principal issues in this case are whether the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center provided plaintiff with satisfactory procedures before terminating his employment and whether the termination violated plaintiff’s first amendment rights under the United States…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Riggins v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Den Hartog v. Wasatch AcademyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Sturdevant v. PaulsenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Federal Lands Legal Consortium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Montgomery v. City of ArdmoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.