Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Bingham
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Ward, Associate Justice.
This appeal presents to this Court for solution an important and far-reaching question. Briefly stated the question is: Is the loss to an owner of land abutting a public highway occasioned by a diversion of traffic a compensable loss? The essential and undisputed facts posing the above question and presenting the background out of which it arose are substantially as hereinafter set out.
Sometime prior to 1954 the Arkansas State Highway Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”) acquired a right-of-way from Little Rock to Benton for the purpose of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Muse v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Fort Smith v. Van ZandtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Blumenstein v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- State v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Wilson & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.