Legal Opinion

Lyons v. Shearman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 12, 1954No. 48391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

— Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment on a verdict for the defendant in a replevin action.

Plaintiffs assert six errors as a basis for a reversal. The defendant in support of the judgment presents four propositions, one of them alleging that replevin does not lie, under the facts in this case; that therefore any errors committed by the trial court in the submission to the jury are without prejudice. Such procedure by the defendant is authorized under our practice. In Mulroney Mfg. Co. v. Weeks, 185 Iowa 714, 717, 171 N.W. 36, 37, we said: “We think it clear, therefore, that the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re the Assignment of ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Mulroney Manufacturing Co. v. WeeksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Foley v. MathiasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. J. J. Smith Lumber Co. v. Scott County Garbage Reducing & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Comparet v. Wm. H. Metz Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roush v. Mahaska State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Walther v. Central Trust Co., N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Prenger v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Marx Truck Line, Inc. v. FredricksenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Ritchie v. HilmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API