Legal Opinion

Rivera Ex Rel. Rivera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2000No. 990197PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

T1 Appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) filed this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's ruling denying its motion to strike stipulated facts, denying its motion for partial summary judgment, and granting appel-lee Vange Rivera's motion for partial summary judgment. State Farm contends the trial court exceeded its permitted range of discretion by refusing to set aside the stipulation of facts and erred in concluding that State Farm was required to provide coverage for Rivera's injuries and claims. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 On September 24,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willie N. Mayfield and Garland P. Edwards v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  2. K & T, INC. v. KoroulisUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. VelasquezUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dove v. CudeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Clark v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. Nelson-WaggonerUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MeadUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Yeargin, Inc. v. Auditing Division of Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Young v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API